Source: rwmalonemd.substack.com
Release of heavily redacted German government documents obtained under court order by the German alternative media magazine “Multipolar” are shaking up German politics on the eve of the critical 2024 European Parliament election in Germany, which is scheduled to be held on 9 June 2024. The documents reveal COVIDcrisis policy interactions and deference by Robert Koch Institute (RKI) public health scientists to unnamed politicians. The over 1,000 pages of these German language redacted documents can currently be downloaded from this website.
Despite extensive redactions (ergo censorship) in the currently released documents, one key fact which has been revealed is that politician(s) overrode RKI scientists and physicians to enact mandated but counterproductive COVID public health policies. The identity of these politicians were redacted, but they may reside within the German government, or may be from the superior European Union (which can and often does overrule the semi-autonomous German Bundestag). Separate disclosures have revealed what appears to be insider dealing with mRNA vaccine manufacturer Pfizer (“Pfizergate”) by Ursula von der Leyen, who has served as President of the European Commission since 1 December 2019, following nomination by the European Council and election by the European Parliament. A lawsuit to force disclosure of the hidden negotiations and communications between Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizer is currently pending in Belgium. Neither the European Parliament, the European Council nor the President of the European Commission are directly elected by the general European populace.
A major political shift in the composition of the European Parliament may occur consequent to the 2024 European Parliament election, with the increasing electoral strength of populist parties throughout Europe posing a threat to the continued dominance of the left wing coalitions (increasingly far-left socialists) which have controlled that chamber for decades. Such an outcome could result in more widespread disclosure of collusion between pharma, corporatist and globalist financial longer range planning and interests with the various EU political structures. There is evidence indicating collusion to implement totalitarian policies such as the lockdowns, vaccine passport/green card system, and legal restrictions which were mandated for most Europeans during the COVIDcrisis. All cause mortality data indicate that EU Nations which did not fully comply with these arbitrary and capricious policies (such as Sweden and Romania) had the best COVIDcrisis outcomes, raising questions of political consequences for those governments that aggressively complied with EU and WHO-promoted totalitarian policies. Electoral ascendency of multiple European populist political movements and parties is seen as a threat to the stability of the European Union experiment, a variety of globalist organizations, and by extension is seen as a threat to the North American Treaty Organization (NATO). In other words, in some European and domestic US circles, the public release of the RKI document trove- particularly in un-redacted form- is seen as an existential threat to both EU and NATO.
Not surprisingly, the topic of the new court-ordered RKI disclosures and the information already revealed is not being covered in American legacy media, and to date has also been largely ignored by North American alternative media. The situation is eerily reminiscent of the silence of US legacy media in response to the US Federal court ordered release of Pfizer documents relating to the COVID mRNA “vaccine” product marketed by that company.
The Robert Koch Institute or RKI is essentially the German government equivalent to the US HHS Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). For further context, the German Paul Erlich Institute is structured and functions much like the US HHS Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and both are often relied upon by the European Union/Parliament political structure to provided CDC and FDA-like functions for the EU. In this context, RKI interacts closely with the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). RKI and ECDC also cooperate closely with the US HHS CDC and WHO, as does the Chinese CDC. All of these institutions exchange information concerning infectious disease threat assessment and public policy recommendations, and during the COVIDcrisis ignored previously established public health norms to implement policies aligned with those advocated by the CCP and Chinese CDC. Unresolved is how this happened. The RKI disclosures support the hypothesis that these abrupt policy revisions were driven by a political influence campaign rather than by carefully deliberated scientific and medical considerations….