Story at a glance:
- Within weeks of the pandemic outbreak, it had become apparent that the standard practice of putting COVID-19 patients on mechanical ventilation was a death sentence; 76.4% of COVID-19 patients (aged 18 to 65) in New York City who were placed on ventilators died. Among patients over age 65 who were vented, the mortality rate was 97.2%.
- The recommendation to place COVID-19 patients on mechanical ventilation as a first-line response came from the World Health Organization (WHO), which allegedly based its guidance on experiences and recommendations from doctors in China. But venting COVID-19 patients wasn’t recommended because it increased survival. It was to protect healthcare workers by isolating the virus inside the vent machine.
- Data suggest around 10,000 patients died with COVID-19 in New York hospitals after being put on ventilators in the spring of 2020. Other metropolitan areas also saw massive spikes in deaths among younger individuals who were at low risk of dying from COVID-19. It’s possible many of these deaths were the result of being placed on mechanical ventilation.
- The WHO must be held accountable for its unethical recommendation to sacrifice suspected COVID-19 patients by using ventilation as an infection mitigation strategy — especially considering they’re now trying to get unilateral power and authority to make pandemic decisions without local input.
- Showing how the WHO’s recommendation to put patients on mechanical ventilation resulted in needless death among people who weren’t at great risk of dying from COVID-19 is perhaps one of the most powerful talking points a country can use to argue for independence and rejection of the WHO’s pandemic treaty.
Within weeks of the pandemic outbreak, it had become apparent that the standard practice of putting COVID-19 patients on mechanical ventilation was a death sentence.
By early April 2020, many doctors were already questioning their use, as data showed 76.4% of COVID-19 patients (aged 18 to 65) in New York City who were placed on ventilators died. Among patients over age 65 who were vented, the mortality rate was a whopping 97.2%.
If you were older than 65, you were 26 times more likely to survive if you were NOT placed on a vent.
In a widely-shared YouTube video (below) posted on March 31, 2020, Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell, a critical care specialist at the Mount Sinai Health System in New York, warned that “we must change what we are doing if we want to save as many lives as possible.”
Sidell was adamant that doctors were “treating the wrong disease” and that putting COVID-19 patients on mechanical ventilation was all wrong.
“We are operating under a medical paradigm that is untrue,” Sidell said. “I fear that this misguided treatment will lead to a tremendous amount of harm to a great number of people in a very short time … This method being widely adopted at this very moment at every hospital in the country … is actually doing more harm than good.”
Why were COVID patients put on vents?
The recommendation to place COVID-19 patients on mechanical ventilation as a first-line response came from the WHO, which in early March 2020 published a COVID-19 provider guidance document to healthcare workers, based on experiences and recommendations from doctors in China.
According to the WHO, treatment needed to be rapidly escalated to mechanical ventilation. Ideally, patients should be placed on it immediately. What escaped the public was the primary reason why.
Venting COVID-19 patients wasn’t recommended because it increased survival; rather, it was to protect healthcare workers by isolating the virus inside the mechanical vent machine.
Using less invasive positive air pressure machines could result in the spread of infectious aerosols, the WHO warned. In other words, they put patients to death to “save” staff and other, presumably non-COVID-19, patients.
That ventilation and sedation were used to protect hospital staff was highlighted by The Wall Street Journal in a Dec. 20, 2020, article, which noted:
“Last spring, doctors put patients on ventilators partly to limit contagion at a time when it was less clear how the virus spread, when protective masks and gowns were in short supply.
“Doctors could have employed other kinds of breathing support devices that don’t require risky sedation, but early reports suggested patients using them could spray dangerous amounts of virus into the air, said Theodore Iwashyna, a critical-care physician at the University of Michigan and Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals in Ann Arbor, Mich.
“At the time, he said, doctors and nurses feared the virus would spread through hospitals. ‘We were intubating sick patients very early. Not for the patients’ benefit, but in order to control the epidemic and to save other patients,’ Dr. Iwashyna said. ‘That felt awful.’”
As dryly noted by James Lyons-Weiler in a Jan. 23, Substack article, “euthanizing humans is illegal. Especially for the benefit of other patients. It should feel awful.”
Fauci knew vents did more harm than good
Even Dr. Anthony Fauci, in a mid-June 2022 lecture (below), admitted that placing patients on mechanical ventilation did more harm than good. He said:
“We very, very readily would put people on mechanical ventilation, when we found out, through clinical experience, it might have been better just to make sure we positioned them properly in the prone or supine position, and not necessarily to intubate someone so readily, which might have actually caused more harm than good. We learned that as we got more experience.”
Yet government treatment guidelines, to this day, include invasive mechanical ventilation.
If the White House Coronavirus Task Force knew in the summer of 2022 that venting patients caused more harm than good, why didn’t they instruct hospitals to stop using it? Or at a bare minimum, strongly advise against it?
And why did the government continue to financially incentivize the use of mechanical ventilation after they’d realized how bad it was?
While many hospitals did cut down on their use of mechanical ventilation toward the end of 2020 and beyond, it still hasn’t been entirely replaced with noninvasive strategies shown to be far more effective.
Many ‘COVID Patients’ didn’t have COVID
The matter becomes even more perverse when you consider that many “COVID cases” were patients who merely tested positive using faulty PCR testing. They didn’t have COVID-19 but were vented anyway, thanks to the baseless theory that you could have COVID-19 and be infectious without symptoms.
Hospitals also received massive financial incentives to diagnose patients with COVID-19 — whether they had it or not — and to put them on a vent. They also received bonuses for using toxic remdesivir, and they were paid for each COVID-19 death as well. The entire system was set up to reward hospitals for misdiagnosing, mistreating and ultimately killing patients.
China also benefited from the WHO’s misguided advice. While the U.S. clamored for more ventilators, Chinese hospitals started relying on them less and instead they were being exported in huge quantities….